fertjay.blogg.se - Does qcast still work

DOES QCAST STILL WORK UPDATE

If adopted, it would give state legislatures the power to put in place all manner of election laws and rules without any review by the state courts. Supreme Court hears case of web designer who doesn't want to work on same-sex weddingsĪt issue is the so-called independent state legislature theory, put forth in this case by the North Carolina Republican state Legislature.They contended it amounts to an unconstitutional racial preference, and that the federal law impermissibly intrudes on state autonomy. Texas and several families who are adopting American Indian children challenged the law in court. Original story: The case pitted several prospective adoptive parents and the state of Texas against the Indian Child Welfare Act - a federal law aimed at preventing Native American children from being separated from their extended families and their tribes.

By a 7-to-2 vote, the court upheld the law's preferences for Native tribes when Indian children are adopted, ruling that the law does not discriminate on the basis of race and does not impermissibly impose a federal mandate on traditionally state-regulated areas of power. Supreme Court, defying predictions, upheld the Indian Child Welfare Act Thursday.

How a Supreme Court justice's paragraph put the Voting Rights Act in more danger.

What he didn't say was whether the court should revisit some of those precedents. He said he could find "no apparent errors" in the way the lower court applied existing precedents. That was too much for Chief Justice John Roberts, a longtime critic of the Voting Rights Act, but who this time dissented along with the court's three liberals. The state appealed to the Supreme Court, which by a 5-4 vote blocked the lower court ruling, which ordered a new map for the 2022 election, then nine months away. Two of the judges on the panel were Trump appointees, the third a Clinton appointee. In January 2022, a three-judge federal court panel ruled unanimously that Alabama could and should have created two compact congressional districts with a majority, or close to a majority, of Black voters: two districts instead of just one. It's a practice known as packing and cracking. Black voters are either concentrated in that district so they are a supermajority there or spread out across the remaining six districts so that their voting power is diluted. More than a quarter of the state's population is African American, but in only 1 of 7 districts do minority voters have a realistic chance of electing the candidate of their choice. Original story: At issue in Alabama's congressional redistricting plan adopted by the Republican state legislature after the 2020 census. By a vote of 5-4, a coalition of liberal and conservative justices essentially upheld the court's 1986 decision requiring that in states where voting is racially polarized, the legislature must create the maximum number of majority-Black or near-majority-Black congressional districts, using traditional redistricting criteria.

DOES QCAST STILL WORK UPDATE

Update June 8: The Supreme Court ruled against Alabama's defense of an electoral map drawn by the state's Republican-dominated legislature. How the Supreme Court has ruled in the past about affirmative action.

And even though Harvard is a private institution, it still is covered by federal anti-discrimination laws because it accepts federal money for a wide variety of programs. Because UNC is a state school, the question is whether its affirmative-action program violates the 14th Amendment's guarantee to equal protection of the law. University of North CarolinaĪt issue are affirmative action programs at the the University of North Carolina, which until the 1950s did not admit Black students, and Harvard University, which was the model for the Supreme Court's 1978 decision declaring that colleges and universities may consider race as one of many factors, from the applicant's geographical and family background, to their special talents in science, math, athletics, and even whether the applicant is the child of the school's alumni. Harvard and Students for Fair Admission v. Here are the major cases NPR is watching: Affirmative Action So, you know, not the best.Opinions usually are scheduled for Thursday, but with time running out, the court will likely add days in which it will release its decisions. He also commits what wean act of criminal cyber-voyeurism. You know this one, the guy has sex with a pie.